Before I start explaining what the Google Sandbox
theory is, let me make a few things clear:
- The Google Sandbox theory is just that, a theory, and is
without official confirmations from Google or the benefit of
years of observation.
- The Google Sandbox theory has been floating around since
summer 2004, and has only really gained steam after February
4, 2005 , after a major Google index update (something known
as the old Google dance).
- Without being able to verify the existence of a Sandbox,
much less its features, it becomes very hard to devise strategies
to combat its effects.
- Almost everything that you will read on the Internet on the
Google Sandbox theory is conjecture, pieced together from individual
experiences and not from a widescale objective controlled experiment
with hundreds of websites (something that would obviously help
in determining the nature of the Sandbox, but is inherently
impractical given the demand on resources).
What is the Google Sandbox Theory?There are
several theories that attempt explain the Google Sandbox effect.
Essentially, the problem is simple. Webmasters around the world
began to notice that their new websites, optimized and chock
full of inbound links, were not ranking well for their selected
keywords.
In fact, the most common scenario to be reported was that after
being listed in the SERPS (search engine results pages) for a
couple of weeks, pages were either dropped from the index or
ranked extremely low for their most important keywords.
This pattern was tracked down to websites that were created
(by created I mean that their domain name was purchased and the
website was registered) around March 2004. All websites created
around or after March 2004 were said to be suffering from the
Sandbox effect.
Some outliers escaped it completely, but webmasters on a broad
scale had to deal with their websites ranking poorly even for
terms for which they had optimized their websites to death.
Conspiracy theories grew exponentially after the February 2005
update, codenamed ‘Allegra' (how these updates are named
I have no clue), when webmasters began seeing vastly fluctuating
results and fortunes. Well-ranked websites were loosing their
high SERPS positions, while previously low-ranking websites had
gained ground to rank near the top for their keywords.
This was a major update to Google's search engine algorithm,
but what was interesting was the apparent ‘exodus' of websites
from the Google Sandbox. This event gave the strongest evidence
yet of the existence of a Google Sandbox, and allowed SEO experts
to better understand what the Sandbox effect was about.
Possible explanations for the Google Sandbox Effect A
common explanation offered for the Google Sandbox effect is the ‘Time
Delay' factor. Essentially, this theory suggests that Google
releases websites from the Sandbox after a set period of time.
Since many webmasters started feeling the effects of the Sandbox
around March-April 2004 and a lot of those websites were ‘released'
in the ‘Allegra' update, this ‘website aging' theory
has gained a lot of ground.
However, I don't find much truth in the ‘Time Delay' factor
because by itself, it's just an artificially imposed penalty
on websites and does not improve relevancy (the Holy Grail for
search engines). Since Google is the de facto leader of the search
engine industry and is continuously making strides to improve
relevancy in search results, tactics such as this do not fit
in with what we know about Google.
Contrasting evidence from many websites has shown that some
websites created before March 2004 were still not released from
the Google Sandbox, whereas some websites created as late as
July 2004 managed to escape the Google Sandbox effect during
the ‘Allegra' update. Along with shattering the ‘Time
Delay' theory, this also raises some interesting questions. This
evidence has led some webmasters to suggest a ‘link threshold'
theory; once a website has accumulated a certain amount of quantity/quality
inbound links, it is released from the Sandbox.
While this might be closer to the truth, this cannot be all
there is to it. There has been evidence of websites who have
escaped the Google Sandbox effect without massive linkbuilding
campaigns. In my opinion, link-popularity is definitely a factor
in determining when a website is released from the Sandbox but
there is one more caveat attached to it.
This concept is known as ‘link-aging'. Basically, this
theory states that websites are released from the Sandbox based
on the ‘age' of their inbound links. While we only have
limited data to analyze, this seems to be the most likely explanation
for the Google Sandbox effect.
The link-ageing concept is something that confuses people, who
usually consider that it is the website that has to age. While
conceptually, a link to a website can only be as old as the website
itself, yet if you have don't have enough inbound links after
one year, common experience has it that you will not be able
to escape from the Google Sandbox. A quick hop around popular
SEO forums (you do visit SEO forums, don't you?) will lead you
to hundreds of threads discussing various results – some
websites were launched in July 2004 and escaped by December 2004.
Others were stuck in the Sandbox even after the ‘Allegra'
update.
How to find out if your website is sandboxed Finding
out if your website is ‘Sandboxed' is quite simple. If
your website does not appear in any SERPS for your target list
of keywords, or if your results are highly depressing (ranked
somewhere on the 40 th page) even if you have lots of inbound
links and almostperfect on-page optimization, then your website
has been Sandboxed.
Issues such as the Google Sandbox theory tend to distract webmasters
from the core ‘good' SEO practices and inadvertently push
them towards black-hat or quick-fix techniques to exploit the
search engine's weaknesses. The problem with this approach is
its short-sightedness. To explain what I'm talking about, let's
take a small detour and discuss search engine theory.
Understanding search engines If you're looking
to do some SEO, it would help if you tried to understand what
search engines are trying to do. Search engines want to present
the most relevant information to their users. There are two problems
in this – the inaccurate search terms that people use and
the information glut that is the Internet. To counteract, search
engines have developed increasingly complex algorithms to deduce
relevancy of content for different search terms.
How does this help us?
Well, as long as you keep producing highly-targeted, quality
content that is relevant to the subject of your website (and
acquire natural inbound links from related websites), you will
stand a good chance for ranking high in SERPS. It sounds ridiculously
simple, and in this case, it is. As search engine algorithms
evolve, they will continue to do their jobs better, thus becoming
better at filtering out trash and presenting the most relevant
content to their users.
While each search engine will have different methods of determining
search engine placement (Google values inbound links quite a
lot, while Yahoo has recently placed additional value on Title
tags and domain names), in the end all search engines aim to
achieve the same goal, and by aiming to fulfill that goal you
will always be able to ensure that your website can achieve a
good ranking.
Escaping the sandbox... Now, from our discussion
about the Sandbox theory above, you know that at best, the Google
Sandbox is a filter on the search engine's algorithm that has
a dampening influence on websites. While most SEO experts will
tell you that this effect decreases after a certain period of
time, they mistakenly accord it to website aging, or basically,
when the website is first spidered by Googlebot. Actually, the
Sandbox does ‘holds back' new websites but more importantly,
the effects reduce over time not on the basis of website aging,
but on link aging.
This means that the time that you spend in the Google Sandbox
is directly linked to when you start acquiring quality links
for your website. Thus, if you do nothing, your website may not
be released from the Google Sandbox.
However, if you keep your head down and keep up with a low-intensity,
long-term link building plan and keep adding inbound links to
your website, you will be released from the Google Sandbox after
an indeterminate period of time (but within a year, probably
six months). In other words, the filter will stop having such
a massive effect on your website. As the ‘Allegra' update
showed, websites that were constantly being optimized during
the time that they were in the Sandbox began to rank quite high
for targeted keywords after the Sandbox effect ended.
This and other observations of the Sandbox phenomenon – combined
with an understanding of search engine philosophy – have
lead me to pinpoint the following strategies for minimizing your
website's ‘Sandboxed' time.
SEO strategies to minimize your website's "sandboxed" time Despite
what some SEO experts might tell you, you don't need do anything
different to escape from the Google Sandbox. In fact, if you
follow the ‘white hat' rules of search engine optimization
and work on the principles I've mentioned many times in this
course, you'll not only minimize your website's Sandboxed time
but you will also ensure that your website ranks in the top 10
for your target keywords. Here's a list of SEO strategies you
should make sure you use when starting out a new website:
- Start promoting your website the moment you create your website,
not when your website is ‘ready'. Don't make the mistake
of waiting for your website to be ‘perfect'. The motto
is to get your product out on the market, as quickly as possible,
and then worry about improving it. Otherwise, how will you
ever start to make money?
- Establish a low-intensity, long-term link building plan and
follow it religiously. For example, you can set yourself a
target of acquiring 20 links per week, or maybe even a target
of contacting 10 link partners a day (of course, with SEO Elite,
link building is a snap). This will ensure that as you build
your website, you also start acquiring inbound links and those
links will age properly – so that by the time your website
exits the Sandbox you would have both a high quantity of inbound
links and a thriving website.
- Avoid black-hat techniques such as keyword stuffing or ‘cloaking'.
Google's search algorithm evolves almost daily, and penalties
for reaking the rules may keep you stuck in the Sandbox longer
than usual.
- Save your time by remembering the 20/80 rule: 80 percent
of your optimization can be accomplished by just 20 percent
of effort. After that, any tweaking left to be done is specific
to current search engine tendencies and liable to become ineffective
once a search engine updates its algorithm. Therefore don't
waste your time in optimizing for each and every search engine – just
get the basics right and move on to the next page.
Remember, you should always optimize with the end-user
in mind, not the search engines.
Like I mentioned earlier, search engines are continuously optimizing
their algorithms in order to improve on the key criteria: relevancy.
By ensuring that your website content is targeted on a particular
keyword, and is judged as ‘good' content based on both
on-page optimization (keyword density) and off-page factors (lots
of quality inbound links), you will also guarantee that your
website will keep ranking highly for your search terms no matter
what changes are brought into a search engine's algorithm, whether
it's a dampening factor a la Sandbox or any other quirk the search
engine industry throws up in the future.
About the Author
Ravikiran is a professional software Develper who blogs about
technology and entrepreneurship his recent blog is ZillionBits -
a blog about number($) and technology. ZB is about learning
skills, sharing information and providing tips on how to make
money online Online
Have you taken a look at
SEO
Elite yet? SEO Lite Industry leading SEO Software.